AI Video Content: When to Use It
Practical applications for AI-generated video
AI video generation has leapfrogged from experimental to practical in 2024-2025. Tools like Runway, Pika, and Sora can create video content that was previously expensive or impossible. But knowing when to use AI video—and when not to—is critical.
Viable AI Video Use Cases
Product Demonstrations AI can animate product images, show features in action, and create explanatory sequences. Best for digital products and concepts.
Social Media Content Short-form video for TikTok, Reels, and Stories. Volume matters more than perfection. AI enables testing multiple variations.
Personalized Video at Scale Welcome videos, thank-you messages, custom greetings—personalized content without filming each individually.
Training and Internal Communications Talking head videos from scripts. Avatar presenters for consistent training content.
Background and B-Roll Abstract motion graphics, environmental footage, transitional content. Supplement rather than replace hero footage.
Explainer Animations Abstract concepts brought to life. AI excels at visualizing ideas that would be expensive to animate traditionally.
Where AI Video Falls Short
Brand Spokesperson Content Real people build trust. AI avatars—even good ones—feel different. Use real footage for leadership messages.
Customer Testimonials Authenticity matters. Real customers on camera outperform any AI alternative.
Complex Physical Products AI can't film your actual product. Real footage for physical goods demonstrations.
Local and Personal Content Your office, your team, your community—these require actual filming.
High-Stakes Content Investor presentations, major brand campaigns, anything where production quality is scrutinized.
Quality Expectations and Limitations
Current Capabilities (2025): - 4K resolution possible - 10-60 second clips typical - Consistent style within clips - Improving motion consistency - Good for abstract and conceptual content
Ongoing Challenges: - Physics inconsistencies (gravity, movement) - Human face/body coherence over time - Text rendering in video - Brand element precision - Long-form continuity
Practical Guideline: If viewers will scrutinize closely, use traditional production. If content is consumed quickly and in volume, AI video often suffices.
Cost and Time Comparison
Traditional Video Production: - Simple talking head: $1,000-$3,000 - Explainer animation: $5,000-$20,000 - Product video: $3,000-$15,000 - Timeline: 2-8 weeks
AI Video Generation: - Tool subscription: $50-$500/month - Per-video generation: $5-$50 - Refinement time: 1-4 hours - Timeline: Same day to one week
Volume Economics: At 5+ videos per month, AI generation dramatically reduces costs. At 20+ videos, savings become transformational.
Hybrid Approach: Many businesses combine AI-generated elements with human-created content. AI handles volume; humans handle hero content.
Getting Started Checklist
Assessment Phase: - Inventory current video needs - Identify high-volume, lower-stakes opportunities - Estimate monthly video requirements - Define quality thresholds by content type
Tool Selection: - Runway ML: Best overall generation quality - Pika Labs: Good for stylized content - Synthesia: Avatar-based talking head videos - HeyGen: Personalized video at scale
Process Setup: - Create prompt templates for consistent output - Establish quality review workflow - Define approval criteria - Build asset library of successful generations
Integration: - Connect to content calendar - Train team on tool usage - Set up feedback loops for improvement - Measure cost and time savings
CHECKLIST
AI Video Readiness Checklist
0 of 8 completed
MORE INSIGHTS
Related reading.
Ready to talk?
Book a call to discuss your project. 15 minutes, no prep required.